Home » Posts tagged 'constitution'
Tag Archives: constitution
Same-sex marriage is unconstitutional
The unconstitutionality of same-sex marriage becomes obvious, if the society understands ‘what is sex’, ‘what is marriage,’ what is a constitution’ and ‘how the latter was adopted by different nations to govern their respective national behaviors’. Specifically, same-sex proponents are invoking their alleged constitutional rights but forgetting the fact that the ‘types of sex and marriage’ they are promoting are not within the ambit of the present constitutions.
The banana republic and same-sex marriage
In fact, same-sex marriage is a misnomer or a misplaced terminology or ideology. In short, same-sex marriage, which is even bereft of any sexual basis, is grossly unconstitutional.
Also, the term is not only misplaced but also promoting the biblically prohibited ‘oral sex‘ (Genesis 9:4).
Further, it is possible that same-sex advocates will be just be finally found to be spiritually and psychologically confused of their aberrant nature, which can still be helped by society not by making their aberrant proposition as constitutionally valid but by way of advise, either psychological, medical or spiritual.
Above are without prejudice to discovery of treatments that may be published later by theologians, physiologists, researchers and scientists ‘to treat the said aberrant behavior’.
Furthermore, if same-sex proponents insist on their proposition, they should be logically required to adopt and pass their own constitution to make their oral or anal sex appearing constitutional. (more…)
Constitution Aggravates Sodomy
Out of the thirteen (13) states in the US, which had legalized sodomy, namely; California, Iowa, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, the first three (3) have in common as aggravating circumstance in sodomy.
Coming Soon: Judgement on the Constitution and the Supreme Court. http://www.wordatthenet.com
US federal constitution and the constitution of the rest of the above states make no reference to God, but California, Iowa and Massachusetts “generally use an invocatio of “God the Almighty” or the “Supreme Ruler of the Universe” in their respective constitution.”(Wikipedia).
What is the implication of invoking God in the basic law or constitution of the land? The danger is that: In the event inhabitants are committing acts against God’s prohibition, they deemed made use of the name of God in vain, in the constitution.
The result is very catastrophic. The Word is emphatic on this. If Israelites, the chosen people, were punished for not obeying the commandments, how much more for non-israelites, who initially invoke His Name (more…)
WORDatTheNet 